<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>informage: Electoral propriety</title>
    <link>http://informage.net/articles/2004/11/11/electoral-propriety</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>tales from anglospheric la-la-land</description>
    <item>
      <title>Electoral propriety</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Now I am not a black chopper guy, apart from anything else I think that there's enough bad crap out there that's openly admitted without distracting our attention with tenuous stories.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
However, the more articles like &lt;a href="http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1106-30.htm"&gt;this one on commondreams.org&lt;/a&gt; (amongst other sources) that I read, the more I wonder exactly how "free and fair" this little election the other day was. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Reserving judgement right now, but I'm keeping an eye on this story. &lt;small&gt;(2004-11-08)&lt;/small&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
UPDATE: Simon responded with a link to a &lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2004/11/10/voting/"&gt;Salon article&lt;/a&gt; that concludes &lt;i&gt;"The system is clearly broken. But there is no evidence that Bush won because of voter fraud."&lt;/i&gt; I don't really argue with that, although the suspicious voice inside me wonders what percentage of actual irregularities the evidence covers. As I said,  I'm not a black chopper type, so I'll leave it at that for now.  
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Whether there was any deliberate wrong-doing, or just smatterings of incompetence and error, it makes the arrogant US attitude that they don't need foreign observers at their elections look even stupider than it did anyway - see for example &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3971459.stm"&gt;this BBC article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;small&gt;(2004-11-11)&lt;/small&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;(by the way, Simon complained that comments are no more here. Well, I got bored of cleaning up spam. Anyone is welcome to email me comments which I will post verbatim if requested to - for those that don't know my email address you'll have to email &lt;a href="mailto:sean@infomage.net"&gt;sean@informage.net&lt;/a&gt; and look carefully at the bounce. Sorry about the hoops, but that's the way its gonna be).&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:35da7bca521444578dc5be333f1e99f3</guid>
      <author>sean</author>
      <link>http://informage.net/articles/2004/11/11/electoral-propriety</link>
      <category>worldage</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://informage.net/articles/trackback/34</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
